UFO Culture

Tuesday, February 8, 2011

Exopoliticians: Diplomacy without diplomats

I have nothing against Exopolitics.

There is no secret here, but we need two for tango. That’s the basic deconstructive contradiction, and because of this, Exopolitics deconstructs itself.

The existence of Exopolitics as a discipline, science, or whatever you want to call it, depends of, at least two sides, two parts willing to establish diplomatic relationships.

However, there are not such two sides, and more there is not even one side.

Let’s agree for a moment with the hypothesis of the extraterrestrial origin of the Unidentified Dynamic Entities, usually called UFOS.

Let’s believe that these gentlemen, or gentle…something, have been here for the last three of four thousand years, wasting their time and money and showing no interest in any diplomatic contact. In fact in any contact at all.

In our own side, the same is true: only people belonging the UFO subculture show any interest in contacting the Aliens.

Earth governments have enormous problems to solve, and probably they will not solve these at all.

Things are going bad here on Earth and neither the People, not the Governments have time for science fiction given as the real thing.

So, the big problem for Exopolitics is that they want diplomacy without diplomats, contacts without contactees and contactors.

Of course we can talk a lot, about Colonel Shadow, anonymous sources, personal private contacting experiences, whistleblowers without Evidences, and obscure “mystics”, but, honestly something more is needed.

Talking and writing is easy. After all, evidences are not needed at all.

Just watch the ufological environment. Each one has his /her own definition. So they fight: “my ET is better than your ET”; “my Pleiadeans are nicer than your Zetas.”

And one more word for those who dislike what I say here.

I can be what you want: cabal operative, a psyop, the Devil or a member of the Opus Dei but remember that these accusations DO NOT ANSWER the arguments.

The Ad Hominem Fallacy is precisely that: If you cannot deny what your opponent says, just attack him; call him names.

Fraternally

Tomas Scolarici

Saturday, February 5, 2011

Exopoliticians: War goes on...no peace.

FOR THE RECORD, HERE IS MICHAEL SALLA'S RESPONSE TO THE ABOVE STATEMENT.

In my judgment, Salla continues to avoid responsibility by lying about his theft of intellectual property in 2003 using clever and snide remarks to do so, and has chose...n to reject settlement of this matter. It is common to direct persons to change incorrect details on your biography in Wikipedia, for example. In Light, Alfred Lambremont Webre, Vancouver, Feb, 5, 2011

"Richard, regarding the Wikipedia biographical entry concerning me, it is contrary to Wikipedia rules for the subject of a bio entry to alter it. I have no control over my Wikipedia entry, nor do I post on Wikipedia. As for who is responsible for formulating the concept of exopolitcs I have dealt at length with the historical development of exopolitics here:
http://exopoliticsjournal.com/Journal-vol-1-1-Salla.pdf

"The meaning I give to expolitics in terms of how the ET issue impacts on human political affairs has been widely adopted which is why Wikipedia authors and others attribute the term's origin to me. Webre's definition of exopolitics, like much of his work, is too controversial and marginal. When I first came across it in 2003, I didn't use it since it was way too premature to talk about relations between extraterrestrial civilizations when people are still debating evidence of ET life visiting Earth.

"As for Webre's claim that he holds the intellectual property rights and copyright of exopolitics, I have to conclude that he is launching a new career as a comedian. That's a good thing since we all need to laugh more in dealing with these disputes."

"Aloha

"Michael Salla"

Posted by: Alfred Lambremont Webre | February 05, 2011 at 01:53 PM

Alfred Webre Statement on Exopolitics and Michael Salla

Statement on Exopolitics and Michael Salla

I am very happy that Michael Salla has finally publicly owned up, and begun to realistically describe his contributions to Exopolitics, the science of relations among civilization in the mulit-verse.

His description of his work in Exopolitics at Mary Sutherland's BUFO is historically and legally correct:

"Michael Salla, PhD (Australia) is the founder of Exopolitics.org, a website launched with the online publication of a study paper, "The Need for Exopolitics." Dr Salla has held academic appointments in the United States (1996-2001), and the Department of Political Science, Australian National

University, Canberra, Australia (1994-96). He taught as an adjunct faculty member at George Washington University, Washington DC., in 2002. He is currently researching methods of Transformational Peace as a Researcher in Residence in the Center for Global Peace (2001-2003)

and directing the Center's Peace Ambassador Program which uses transformational peace techniques for individual self-empowerment. He has a PhD in Government from the University of Queensland, Australia, and an MA in Philosophy from the University of Melbourne, Australia.

"He is the author of The Hero's Journey Toward a Second American Century (Greenwood Press, 2002) and author/coeditor of three other books: Essays on Peace (Central Queensland University Press, 1995); Why the Cold War Ended (Greenwood Press, 1995); and Islamic Radicalism, Muslim

Nations and the West (1993). He has authored more than seventy articles, chapters, and book reviews on peace, ethnic conflict and conflict resolution. He has conducted research and fieldwork in

the ethnic conflicts in East Timor, Kosovo, Macedonia, and Sri Lanka. He has organized a number of international workshops involving mid to high level participants from these conflicts.

"His inspiration for creating the Exopolitics web site comes from a lifelong interest in extraterrestrial related phenomena and from his professional experience that to adequately resolve international conflict one must always address the roots. Dealing with the extraterrestrial presence is essential for establishing global peace."

http://www.burlingtonnews.net/interviewsalla.html

To be in full compliance with historical and legal fact about the founding of Exopolitics, Michael Salla must now revise one statement in his current Wikipedia entry to conform with the above.

His Wikipedia states - as of Feb. 4, 2011 - "Exopolitics - The concept of Exopolitics was formulated by Michael Salla."

That statement is incorrect and represents a violation of intellectual property rights and copyright of Alfred LAmbremont Webre, JD, MEd who first formulated Exopolitics in his 2000 book Exopoplitics: A Decade of Contact, on which Dr. Salla based his January 20, 2003 paper, "The Nee for Exopolitics."

Revising this statement in Exopolitics is not too much to ask, now that Michael Salla has begun to set the historical and legal record straight.

Thank you,

Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd

Attorney At Law

Exopolitics.com

Vancouver, BC

Feb. 4, 2011

Wednesday, February 2, 2011

UNIDENTIFIED DYNAMIC ENTITIES

Frequently we become prisoners of our own words and definitions. An example of this was the “Flying Saucers”, referred to the unidentified flying objects or (UFO.) The first highly publicized sighting by Kenneth Arnold on June 24, 1947, resulted in the creation of the term by U.S. newspapers.

This acronym however is not only automatically associated with the idea of UFO as Extraterrestrial crafts but in my view, is not a good definition.

Norio Hayakawa reminds us that "The things we call unidentified flying objects are neither objects nor flying.
They can materialize, as some reliable photographs seem to show, and they violate the laws of motion as we know them".
(QUOTE from Dr. Jacques Vallee's acclaimed book, DIMENSIONS)

The so called flying objects, move and stop in the space in such a way that we cannot define these movements as flying at all.

Same happens with the word “objects” since we do not know if these entities are objects of something else.

I think it’s time to change the UFO definition. Doing this we will open our minds to new possibilities.

Instead of “objects” let’s try with “entities”, and let’s change the word “flying” by “Dynamic”.

We have then a new definition: Unidentified Dynamic Entities. UDE.

The adoption of this new definition and acronym will, in my opinion, help us to remember what we know, and of course what we don’t know about these UDE, ex-UFO.

Tomas Scolarici

Fwd: [RationalUFOLOGY] "My perspective on the UFO phenomenon" by Norio Hayakawa

"My perspective on the UFO phenomenon
by Norio Hayakawa
November 14, 2010

My perspective on the UFO phenomenon is based on the propositions made by both Dr. Jacques Vallee and Tomas Scolarici (a.k.a., James Black):

1. "The things we call unidentified flying objects are neither objects nor flying.
They can materialize, as some reliable photographs seem to show, and they violate the laws of motion as we know them".
(QUOTE from Dr. Jacques Vallee's acclaimed book, DIMENSIONS)

2. "Those unidentified flying objects that remain UNIDENTIFIED and challenge any natural definition, are not a new phenomenon.
These "Entities" are with us from the beginning of our historical times, and perhaps before."
(QUOTE from Tomas Solarici, a.k.a., James Black).

"UFOs have been seen throughout history and have consistently received (or provided) their own explanation within the framework of each culture.
In antiquity their occupants were regarded as gods; in medieval times, as magicians; in the nineteenth century, as scientific geniuses; in our own time, as interplanetary travelers.
(Statements made by occupants of the 1897 airship included such declarations as 'We are from Kansas' and even 'We are from anywhere....but we'll be in Greece tomorrow')"
(QUOTE from Dr. Jacques Vallee's acclaimed book, DIMENSIONS)

3. "UFO reports are not necessarily caused by visits from space travelers. The phenomenon could be a manifestation of a much more complex technology. If time and space are not as simple in structure as physicists have assumed until now, then the question 'Where do they come from?' may be meaningless; they could come from a place in time. If consciousness can be manifested outside the body, then the range of hypotheses can be even wider."
(QUOTE from Dr. Jacques Vallee's acclaimed book, DIMENSIONS)

"The extraterrestrial hypothesis is not satisfactory at all. The time travelers hypothesis about UFOs, is better than the extraterrestrial one, but in no way answers all our questions".
(QUOTE from Tomas Solarici, a.k.a., James Black).

4) "The key to an understanding of the phenomenon lies in the psychic effects it produces (or the psychic awareness it makes possible) in its observers.
Their lives are often deeply changed, and they develop unusual talents with which they may find it difficult to cope.
The proportion of witnesses who do come forward and publish accounts of these experiences is quite low; most of them choose to remain silent".
(QUOTE from Dr. Jacques Vallee's acclaimed book, DIMENSIONS)

5) "Contact between human percipients and the UFO phenomenon always occurs under conditions controlled by the latter. Its characteristic feature is a factor of absurdity that leads to a rejection of the story by the upper layers of the target society and an absorption at a deep unconscious level of the symbols conveyed by the encounter.
The mechanism of this resonance between the UFO symbol and the archetypes of the human unconscious has been abundantly demonstrated by Carl Jung, whose book FLYING SAUCERS makes many references to the age-old significance of the signs in the sky".
(QUOTE from Dr. Jacques Vallee's acclaimed book, DIMENSIONS)

"The UFO phenomenon COEXISTS with us, humans.
The UFO phenomenon is with us, was with our ancestors and will be in the future without changes.
These "Entities" have no need, or are not interested, or cannot openly contact us"
(QUOTE from Tomas Solarici, a.k.a., James Black).

6) "It's possible that the complexity of the UFO phenomenon makes any understanding impossible.
Nobody knows what the UFO phenomenon is, and probably we will never know more"
(QUOTE from Tomas Solarici, a.k.a., James Black).

7) "The UFO phenomenon is not a threat to our security.
The same phenomenon neither was a threat for the Sumerians or Romans, or Indians".
(QUOTE from Tomas Solarici, a.k.a., James Black).

8) "There is no such thing as a cover-up, and the authorities know as little about the nature of the UFO phenomenon as ourselves.
They learned however that the UFO phenomenon is not a threat for our Security".
(QUOTE from Tomas Solarici, a.k.a., James Black).

I am in total agreement with both Dr. Jacques Vallee and Tomas Solarici, a.k.a., James Black.
Yes, they summarize my personal position on the entire UFO phenomenon.
This is the reason why, in my opinion, there will be no such thing as DISCLOSURE by the government.
Sure, the governments of the world could release ALL files on UFO sightings anytime, if they wish to.
However, just releasing such files will do absolutely nothing, since the public will clamor for the explanations as to thwat the UFO phenomenon is.
The government is only responsible for explaining things that deal with physical, tangible, solid, empirical evidence as we know them.
Anything else, the governmet is not in the business of dealing with.
If there will be any DISCLOSURE, it will come directly from the "Entities" themselves or from a paradigm-shifted majority of mankind (which has not happened yet)."